|
Room acoustics affect the tone of a piano far more than is often
realized. Sometimes adjusting the room acoustics is the easiest and
most effective way of "voicing" a piano to a particular loudness
level or balance between treble and bass, after which hammer voicing
can take care of the fine adjustment from note to note.
My own piano is a good example. When I was in high school, my
parents bought what was supposed to be a very fine grand piano, but
at the time I was convinced it was a lemon. The sound was very
muffled and I had to bang on the piano to get what I wanted out of
it. I was told, of course, that it would get louder in time, but
years went by and it never did, despite the strenuous workout I gave
to it.
When I was in my late twenties, I inherited the piano and moved
it to my apartment in Boston, expecting to do some major work on it
to improve the tone (I had, by that time, become a piano
technician). To my surprise, the piano came alive without a stitch
of work on my part. The hardwood floor and the relative lack of
furniture in the room did the work for me. Whereas my parents'
living room had been heavily carpeted and draped and filled with
upholstered chairs and sofas, my apartment was filled with
sound-reflecting surfaces and few sound absorbers.
The sound we hear, especially indoors, comes in part in the form
of direct sound and in larger part from reverberant sound—sound
reflected from walls, floor, ceiling, windows, and so forth.
Acousticians have studied the phenomenon of reverberant sound for
many years in relation to the design of auditoriums and concert
halls, but relatively little work has been done on the acoustical
design of small rooms—practice rooms, living rooms, and
rehearsal studios.
In the study of auditorium acoustics, great emphasis is placed on
the reverberation time—the amount of time it takes for a burst of
sound to decay by sixty decibels (to one-millionth of its original
intensity). The larger the volume of the room and the more
reflective the surfaces, the longer the reverberation time. But too
long a reverberation time will create a "muddy" sound, as one sound
runs into the next. By placing more sound-absorbent surfaces in the
room, the reverberation time can be decreased, but this will also
decrease the intensity of the sound, because sound will not be able
to "build up". Too short a reverberation time will thus create a
"dry" sound, and the performer may have to work too hard to be
heard. Acousticians have found that concert halls sound best when
reverberation time is between 1.5 and 2.0 seconds. The slightly
higher reverberation times work best for Romantic orchestral music,
lower for Classical orchestral music, and lower still for chamber
music.
In a small room, such as a living room or music room, the
reverberation time will usually be much shorter. Efforts to make a
small room sound like a concert hall by increasing the amount of
reflective surface until reverberation time reaches concert-hall
levels usually won't work because in a reverberant small room
certain individual resonant frequencies become prominent, producing
a "shower room" type of reverberation. Anyway, it has been found
through listening tests that piano music in small rooms sounds best
to most people at a reverberation time of about 1.1 seconds, though
individual tastes will vary. Although it's not practical, of course,
for a homeowner to measure reverberation time, it is possible, when
designing a small room, to adjust it to some extent to one's taste
an to balance the treble and bass. The key is in the balance between
absorbent and reflective surfaces, and in the diffusion or
"scattering" of sound so it is evenly dispersed.
Each kind of building and decorating material absorbs sound
differently, and the ability to absorb sound varies with the
frequency, too. A smooth concrete floor, for example, is an
excellent reflector of sound of all frequencies—too good, in fact. A
think carpet on concrete will continue to reflect low frequencies,
but will absorb most sounds of high frequency. Putting a pad under
the carpet will significantly increase its ability to absorb sound
at all frequencies.
A wooden floor is also a good reflector, though a little less so
at low frequencies. A carpet on the floor, especially right under
the piano, may help to create a better balance if the treble is too
brilliant. Because the piano case also vibrates—particularly a grand
piano case—it makes sense to put the rug under the legs of the
piano, too, or to replace metal casters with rubber-wheeled ones so
that the wooden floor doesn't become another soundboard.
Window glass and plywood paneling reflect high frequencies while
somewhat absorbing lower ones. some of the large window or paneled
areas can be covered with a drapery, which will do just the
opposite. Large multi-purpose rehearsal rooms that may have a band
rehearsal one day and a chamber music rehearsal the next may benefit
by hanging a drapery along one wall that can be extended or drawn
into a corner as needed to provide the correct amount of sound
absorption. This technique can also be used for teaching studios
that must accommodate the tastes of several different teachers.
Upholstered furniture, of course, is always useful as a sound
absorber. One can also experiment with different kinds of window
shades and draperies, wall textures and wall hanging, open vs.
closed doors, and the placement of art objects and other things
about the room, all of which will absorb, reflect, or scatter sound.
A living room or music room with a reverberation time of 1.1
seconds, mentioned above, is a fairly "live" room, one with more
reflective surfaces than absorbent ones. One acoustical engineer
consulted suggested that for best results the room should be at
least twice as long as the (grand) piano. Ceilings shouldn't exceed
around 12 feet or reverberation time may increase to the point where
the sound becomes muddy. If there are two acoustically different
ends to the room, the piano should be placed at the "live" end so
the sound can develop and diffuse before being absorbed by the
objects at the other end. Others I spoke with thought that a little
shorter reverberation time, and more absorbent surfaces, yielded
better results.
Small practice rooms should be sound-insulated between rooms, and
should have acoustic tile ceiling. One problem that may develop in
these small rooms is "flutter echo," where flat, reflective,
parallel-sided walls cause the sound to bounce back and forth
annoyingly. Orienting the piano differently in relation to the walls
or putting it in a corner may help, but putting sound absorbing
material on the walls or using large sound-absorbing panels is the
best remedy. When designing small practice rooms, try to avoid
having two sets of parallel walls; one or two walls should be at an
angle to avoid echos. Larger practice rooms are preferable
acoustically, but may not be economical.
Making a room sound more "live"—increasing the sound
reflecting—is generally more difficult than deadening it because
people are usually more reluctant to remove carpets, drapes, and
furniture than they are to add them but, unfortunately, that is
exactly what is required.
Next >
Reprinted with permission from Larry Fine's
The Piano Book. |